Tuesday, September 29, 2020

Austrian Economist Ludwig von Mises on This Day in History


 Today in History: Austrian-American economist, sociologist, and philosopher Ludwig von Mises was born on this day in 1881. Mises was one of the great classical liberal (Libertarian) economists of the time, alongside Milton Friedman, Murray N. Rothbard and Friedrich Hayek. Mises was an early critic of socialism and Marx and argued that a socialist economy was doomed to fail because such a system lacked the signalling information needed for a coherent and sane economy. For instance, a capitalist economy produces signals to producers that consumers want or need so much of a certain item. A centrally planned economic system like socialism has no such mechanism as production decisions are handled by the top few, or even the one.

The socialist author of "The Worldly Philosophers," Robert Heilbroner, after examining the socialist countries of the 20th century, famously declared that "Mises was Right." "Capitalism has been as unmistakable a success as socialism has been a failure. Here is the part that's hard to swallow. It has been the Friedmans, Hayeks, and von Miseses who have maintained that capitalism would flourish and that socialism would develop incurable ailments. All three have regarded capitalism as the 'natural' system of free men; all have maintained that left to its own devices capitalism would achieve material growth more successfully than any other system. From [my samplings] I draw the following discomforting generalization: The farther to the right one looks, the more prescient has been the historical foresight; the farther to the left, the less so."




Thursday, September 17, 2020

Constitution Day on This Day in History

 

Today in History: Today is Constitution Day. The US Constitution has been considered one of the greatest documents ever written, alongside the Magna Carta and the Gutenberg Bible. The Constitution is supposed to put constraints on Government and assure limited Government. Sounds good. However, what started as the smallest government in the world ended becoming the largest. My frustration with the Constitution mirrors that of Lysander Spooner in the 1800's when he wrote: "But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it." 

Back in Spooner's day it was noted that even Abraham Lincoln committed numerous unconstitutional acts: 

"He started a war without the consent of Congress; illegally declared martial law; illegally blockaded Southern ports; illegally suspended habeas corpus and arrested tens of thousands of political opponents; illegally orchestrated the secession of West Virginia; shut down hundreds of opposition newspapers and imprisoned their editors and owners ... ." He also "ignored the Ninth and Tenth amendments; orchestrated the rigging of Northern elections; introduced the slavery of conscription and income taxation; waged war on Southern civilians and ... created an enormous political patronage system that survives today."~Thomas Dilorenzo

Many have recognized that the lockdowns this years are also unconstitutional (hence illegal), yet, here we are. The Constitution is a great document, but perhaps, too often, an ignored one.

Americans (And Their Politicians) Don’t Know Much About the Constitution


Tuesday, September 8, 2020

The Communist/Socialist Universe of Star Trek on This Day in History


This day in history: The landmark American science fiction television series Star Trek premiered on this day in 1966. When you really think about it, the world of Star Trek is a Communist world. There is no private enterprise (no pun intended), and there is no money in ‘Star Trek’ because the transporter/replicator machine makes anything you need. Spock repeatedly reminds Captain Kirk that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, and he continually sacrifices himself each time a crisis occurs. Star Trek has a 5 year mission, Communists had 5 year plans. 

"The shows Deep Space Nine and Enterprise described the rise of communism on Earth in detail. Of course they do not call it communism. They call it 'The New Economy.' In this economy—with rare exception—the government educates you, employs you, feeds you, and assigns you shelter. They build all apartment, 'commercial,' and office buildings, and factories. The exceptional private employers include nostalgic restaurateurs, generational vintners, and the like. The government will let anyone produce specialty goods or services as a creative outlet. But for all other goods and services, the government provides." Conservapedia

In one episode Lily Sloane asked Picard how much the USS Enterprise had cost to build, he told her, "the economics of the future is somewhat different. You see, money doesn't exist in the 24th century... The acquisition of wealth is no longer the driving force in our lives. We work to better ourselves and the rest of Humanity." (Star Trek: First Contact)

This is all idealistic utopian nonsense akin to Edward Bellamy's 1888 book "Looking Backward." Socialism/Communism never improved society. Quite the opposite in fact. It has lead to mass deaths and starvation...it has always failed, and failed spectacularly. When you see these large majestic ships in the Star Trek universe, remind yourself that you never really see Russian Ladas and Yugos on the road anymore.

There was one species that was interested in commerce and trade (capitalism), the Ferengi, but they were portrayed in the most negative light.



Wednesday, September 2, 2020

German Philosopher Hans-Hermann Hoppe on This Day in History


Today in History: German political philosopher Hans-Hermann Hoppe was born on this day in 1949. Hoppe, who can be described as an Austrian school libertarian anarcho-capitalist economist who is best know for his book "Democracy: The God that Failed."

In this book, Hoppe argues that democracy is not an improvement over monarchy. Politicians in a democracy have a very high time preference (they value immediate gratification) because they have to please their constituents in the short span of a term in order to get re-elected. Thus, democracy is short-sighted and favors short-term gains over long-term losses. Monarchy, on the other hand, is the opposite. Monarchs have low time preference for three reasons: (1) their reign lasts for a lifetime (2) they will pass their kingdom on to their heirs, and (3) they have total ownership of their kingdom. Hence, monarchs have a greater incentive to maintain their society over time.

Of course, Hoppe would rather have neither system, but it is food for thought.