Sunday, July 28, 2019

To Be Governed Is To Be Watched


To be governed, is to be watched, inspected, spied, directed, law-ridden, regulated, penned up, indoctrinated, preached at, checked, appraised, seized, censured, commanded, by beings who have neither title nor knowledge nor virtue. To be governed is to have every operation, every transaction, every movement noted, registered, counted, rated, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, refused, authorized, indorsed, admonished, prevented, reformed, redressed, corrected. To be governed is, under pretext of public utility and in the name of the general interest, to be laid under contribution, drilled, fleeced, exploited, monopolized, extorted from, exhausted, hoaxed and robbed; then, upon the slightest resistance, at the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified, annoyed, hunted down, pulled about, beaten, disarmed, bound, imprisoned, shot, mitrailleused, judged, condemned, banished, sacrificed, sold, betrayed, and, to crown all, ridiculed, derided, outraged, dishonored.—Proudhon

Sunday, July 21, 2019

Socialism and Competition, 1910 Article


Socialism and Competition, article in Watson's Jeffersonian Magazine 1910

As to eliminating competition, we might as well speak of stopping the movement of the waves upon the ocean, of the clouds in the sky. How would strength be developed, were there no rivalry, no competition? If you are strong, it is because you have had to do battle with circumstance and competitors. If I am strong, it is because I have been a fighter, from my youth up. As long as the contest is a fair one, nobody is wronged. The loser pays— that's all. Over the whole universe is written by the hand of Jehovah the stern old Roman adage vae victis—woe to vanquished. Good heavens! How bat-like these Socialists are! They ignore the simplest facts that lie right before their eyes. On the earth, in the sea, in the air, is the fiercest competition, going on by night and by day. The race is to the swift, the battle to the strong. Nature has no pity, no hate, no love. She smites all who violate her laws, whether we know what those laws are, or not. You violate some unwritten rule as to health, and down you go, no matter how good and useful your life may be. The Pestilence does not spare the righteous: Famine takes no account of your faith: Misfortune never separates sheep from goats. "Obey my laws, or perish", is the inexorable command of Nature. The man who fails to see this is either hopelessly stupid, or the victim of hereditary superstition. Be honest with yourself, Reader. See things as they are. Be as hopeful as you can; work, like fighting fire, to make the world better; but don't enwrap yourself in delusions.

Competition is the law of life, and the survival is to the fittest. Ever and ever, Nature works to get rid of the feeble. Ever and ever, she labors to evolve the perfect. The wisdom of the sages has been devoted to the fixing of the rules which govern competition; and so long as those rules are followed, competition is as natural and as harmless as the flow of the sap and the birth of the flowers.

Work! Without haste and without rest. WORK! All nature cries it. The constellations on high proclaim it. The restless tides of the seas, bear witness to it. The bounding blood in our veins, the crowding thoughts in our minds, the eager longing in our souls are ever present, never failing reminders that the Hymn of Life sounds the order for the battle and the march. The muffled drums within us beat the everlasting Reveille; and with the sun of each day, begins the fight anew.

Abolish all this? How could we? The stream cannot rise higher than its source, and humanity cannot escape its own limitations.

Co-operation on a small scale is a perfect success. Why? Because it competes. It brings the power of unionized effort to bear against individual enterprise. But no Socialist experiment ever succeeded. It has been tried, over and over again, both in America and in Europe, in ancient as well as modern times. Wayland himself chose a nice lot of human angels, and tried his fad at Ruskin, Tennessee. He discovered that his cherubs were just human bipeds, and Ruskin failed to become a Paradise. Instead, there was a lovely row among the Elect, and the colony was torn to pieces by factions. Scores of times, carefully selected men and women, who imagined themselves congenially altruistic, have turned their self-complacent backs upon us common clod-hoppers, and gone off to themselves to make a Garden of Eden. But never have they succeeded in making one. The serpent invariably enters; and it is the old story of Paradise Lost.

If the selected colonies fail to make a success of Socialism, how could the miscellaneous mass do it? If elemental human traits bring dismal failure to the chosen, congenial, altruistic groups, how can a person gifted with ordinary common-sense bring himself to believe that a similar experiment would succeed, when made with all the wicked people taken into the venture? If Socialism meets with invariable failure, when tried by the best people, could you reasonably expect better results from it, when the worst people are included in the venture?

Thursday, July 4, 2019

The First Fourth of July


Mr. Woods is a free-lance editor and author of numerous books and magazine articles.

It seems safe but it is hardly pleasing to say that few of the millions who jam the highways, beaches, lakes, amusement parks, picnic grounds, baseball diamonds, golf links, restaurants, and theaters this Fourth of July will give a thought to that which we celebrate and those whom we honor: that is, the Declaration of Independence, the courageous men who signed it, and the brave men and women of the first thirteen states who accepted, supported, and fought for its principles.

"The Day of Deliverance," John Adams called it in a letter to his wife, Abigail. "I am apt to be­lieve," he wrote, "that it will be celebrated by succeeding genera­tions as the great anniversary festival. It ought to be commemor­ated . . . by solemn acts of devo­tion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and pa­rade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, and illumina­tions, from one end of this contin­ent to the other, from this time forward forevermore."

Although it is easy to understand and share Adams‘ enthusi­asm, it should not be supposed that the drafting, endorsement, and signing of the Declaration was a gay and reckless proceeding.

Jefferson‘s great document owes its genesis to the revolu­tionary assembly of Virginia when, thirteen months after Con­cord and Lexington, it instructed its delegates to the Continental Congress to propose independence. Richard Henry Lee of Virginia presented the resolution on June 7, but Congress postponed deci­sion to July 1.

As General Howe’s fleet was being sighted off New York Har­bor, the Second Continental Con­gress, meeting in the State House (later Independence Hall) in Philadelphia, began its momen­tous debate on Lee’s resolution and the supporting Declaration Thom­as Jefferson had been requested to write. Jefferson’s great document was cut and amended in the course of a four-day debate by some forty-odd men of position and property from the thirteen colonies, while Washington’s rag, tag, and bob­tail and outnumbered army in New York was being further en­dangered by additional redcoats from the newly anchored British fleet. Consequently, the natural tenseness of the drama being en­acted in Philadelphia was heightened repeatedly by the ar­rival of couriers with messages from distressed colonial assem­blies, and by unfailingly calm but desperate pleas from General Washington for more men and supplies.

When the delegates assembled on the morning of July 3, an anonymous note was found on the Speaker’s table: "Take care. A plot is framed for your destruc­tion and all of you shall be des­troyed." Several nervous delegates thought the cellars of the State House should be searched, espe­cially since there were many loyal­ist sympathizers in Philadelphia. But most of the delegates agreed with Joseph Hewes of North Caro­lina when he urged the note be ignored, adding, "I’d as soon be blown to bits as proclaim to the world I was scared by a silly note."

The sense of urgency in the Congress became so great by the afternoon of July 4 that a final vote was taken—resulting in unanimous agreement that "we hold these truths to be self-evi­dent" and that "with a firm re­liance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our For­tunes, and our sacred Honor." Delegate after delegate stood up and declared himself. (Four dele­gates, obliged to abstain from vot­ing because they lacked instruc­tions from their home assemblies, later in the month signed the document; four others refused to sign and resigned from Con­gress.)

When everyone had openly de­clared himself, each man signed the Declaration with full aware­ness that this step into a new dawn also placed him in the shadow of the gallows for treason to the British Crown. They knew, too, that their signatures could be brands that burned their homes, warrants that confiscated their farms, whips that lashed their wives and children into exile. But sign they did; some quietly, others boldly, a few with a jest, none with a whine or whimper.

White-haired Stephen Hopkins from Rhode Island, whose hands trem­bled from a sickness, said as he scrawled his signature, "My hand may tremble but my heart does not!" Fifty-five members of the Con­tinental Congress ultimately signed the Declaration as en­grossed on parchment on August 2, 1776; later, seven who were absent signed, followed by the signature of six who became mem­bers of the Congress shortly after July 4.

Congress had resolved "to prevent traitors and spies from worming themselves amongst us, no person shall have a seat in Con­gress until he shall have signed the Declaration." The Declaration appeared for the first time in a newspaper, the Pennsylvania, Evening Post of Philadelphia, on Saturday, July 6, but created little or no excitement.

John Dunlap, printer to Congress, had been ordered to print as quickly as possible carefully-proofed copies of the Declaration. Couriers were held in readiness to gallop over the roads with cop­ies for the new independent states. Congress had resolved that the Declaration should be read to pub­lic assemblies, citizens commit­tees, councils, militia, and that copies be delivered "to the minis­ters of each parish, of every de­nomination, to be read as soon as divine service is ended, on the first Lord’s Day after they shall have received it," and that the clergymen should then give their copies to the clerk of the town council who was "required to re­cord the same."

The first public celebration of the Declaration began in Philadel­phia early on Monday, July 8, when a man was instructed to climb the State House tower to ring the bell—the Liberty Bell. The bells of other churches in the town quickly joined in, and all continued to ring the rest of that day and night. By noon, the yard back of the State House was packed with people come to hear the news.

Jefferson, Franklin, and Hancock were among those on the platform when the Sheriff of Philadelphia became the first one publicly to proclaim the Declara­tion. The King’s banners and arms were torn from all public places and dumped on the Com­mons for a bonfire. Later in the day, the Declaration was again read at the same spot, followed by volleys from the militia, cheers, speeches, toasts, fireworks, and il­lumination.

Samuel Adams, in his room at Philadelphia that day, picked up hundreds of letters written to him by patriots over the years—letters that would in­criminate many of his friends if they fell into enemy hands—and he tore the letters into shreds and tossed the confetti into the street to add to the festivities.

Meanwhile, couriers on horse­back were speeding copies of the Declaration to all the new states, some communities of which did not get the news until a month later. An express rider on his way to General Washington’s headquarters in New York, stopped at New Brunswick, New Jersey, early Tuesday morning. He was sent on his way with a fresh horse when he showed a copy of the Dec­laration.

The town council decided to read the document in front of the White Hall Tavern that same day "to overawe any disaffected Tories," and in the evening the document was proclaimed to the College of New Jersey, which was followed by volleys of musket fire and general celebration.

Bridge­ton, Perth Amboy, and Dover, New Jersey, soon followed with their own celebrations—volleys, feasting, parades, and bonfires. At 6 p.m. on Tuesday, July 9, a hollow square was formed by a brigade of Washington‘s soldiers in New York. Washington sat on his horse within the square as an aide read the Declaration to the troops, within sight of the great British fleet in the harbor. At its conclusion soldiers and citizens proceeded to the Bowling Green and demolished a gilt equestrian statue of George III. The four thousand pounds of lead in it would make musket balls.

Wherever and whenever the news arrived, there were formal proclamations of the Declaration, usually followed by volleys of mus­ket or cannon—thirteen was the magic number—then by parades, and often by thirteen toasts in rum or wine. Town and village of­ficials were expected to swear to uphold the rights of the new na­tion, and all signs and symbols of the British crown were removed and destroyed. A Connecticut inn­keeper was jailed for opposing the Declaration, and some of the new­ly born were named Independence, Washington, Adams, or Hancock. Yale University‘s future presi­dent, Ezra Stiles, noted in his diary that "the whole continent is all alive."

Militant Boston re­ceived the stirring news July 18 and had elaborate ceremonies and celebrations. Worcester had joy­ously erupted four days earlier. One week after Boston‘s festivi­ties, Williamsburg, Virginia, pro­claimed the Declaration with read­ings in front of the Capitol, the Court House, and the Palace in the presence of such notables as George Mason, Patrick Henry, and Richard Henry Lee. Many toasts were drunk that evening in the famous Raleigh Tavern. The document was read to excited crowds at Halifax, North Caro­lina. Charleston, South Carolina, made the occasion both solemn and gay, helped by people from all parts of the state who had come to town for the event. Savannah had a solemn funeral procession which was ended with the burial of George III in effigy, a minister "committing his existence to the ground."

Many towns had Liberty Trees or Liberty Poles at which ceremonies were conducted. In Huntington, Long Island, they made an effigy of George III, lined it with gunpowder, wrapped it in the now repudiated flag, hung it on the Liberty Pole, ig­nited it, and howled with glee when George exploded with a bang.

One year later, Private Elijah Fisher, a member of George Wash­ington’s guard when the Comman­der-in-Chief was with his army at New Brunswick, New Jersey, re­corded in his diary: "We Sele­brated the Independence of Amer­ica, the howl army parraded….the artillery Discharged thirteen Can­non. we gave three Chears. At Night his excelency and the gen­tlemen and Ladys had a Bawl at Head Quarters with grate Pompe." Fifty years later, on July 4, 1826, only three signers of the Declaration of Independence sur­vived: Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Charles Carroll of Carrollton. And at the close of that day only Carroll survived.

Jefferson died shortly after noon at his home at Monticello, Vir­ginia, at the age of eighty-three. Adams died later that day at his farmhouse outside Braintree, Massachusetts, at the age of ninety-one, saying at the end, "Jefferson still survives." That morning when Adams was told it was the Fourth of July, he said, "It’s a great day—a good day."

EDITOR’S NOTE: For further reference to the men, the events, and the spirit of 1776, see the review by Edmund Opitz on page 63.
***Liberty 1776 We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain un­alienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Govern­ment becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Ralph L. Woods
This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.

Monday, July 1, 2019

Thomas Sowell on Slavery as a Worldwide Evil


Thomas Sowell has been one of the my favorite writers and thinkers for quite some time now. I love his intellect and he is one of the most quotable people when it comes to race, politics and economics. Here is an excert on slavery from Black Rednecks and White Liberals by Thomas Sowell:

SLAVERY WAS AN EVIL OF GREATER SCOPE and magnitude than most people imagine and, as a result, its place in history is radically different from the way it is usually portrayed. Mention slavery
and immediately the image that arises is that of Africans and their descendants enslaved by Europeans and their descendants in the Southern United States—or, at most, Africans enslaved by Europeans in the Western Hemisphere. No other historic horror is so narrowly construed. No one thinks of war, famine, or decimating epidemics in such localized terms. These are afflictions that have been suffered by the entire human race, all over the planet—and so was slavery. Had slavery been limited to one race in one country during three centuries, its tragedies would not have been
one-tenth the magnitude that they were in fact.

Why this provincial view of a worldwide evil? Often it is those who are most critical of a “Eurocentric” view of the world who are most Eurocentric when it comes to the evils and failings of the human race. Why would anyone wish to arbitrarily understate an evil that plagued mankind for thousands of years, unless it was not this evil itself that was the real concern, but rather the
present-day uses of that historic evil? Clearly, the ability to score ideological points against American society or Western civilization, or to induce guilt and thereby extract benefits from the white population today, are greatly enhanced by making enslavement appear to be a peculiarly American, or a peculiarly white, crime.

Listen to an audio rendition of this here: