Saturday, January 25, 2020

Stock Investing Books you Won't Believe Are Online For FREE


Many Books you won't believe are online for free...but you may have to hurry before they are taken down. I did not post any of these books, these are simply books I found in my online travels.

For a list of all of my digital books and books on disk click here

See also True Crime, Mysteries & More-Over 100 Books you Won't Believe Are Online For FREE and Ed & Lorraine Warren & 100 Other Books You Won't Believe Are Online for FREE and Mysteries & Censorship etc - Over 100 Books You Won't Believe Are Online For FREE & Christology, Mythology & 100 Other Books You Won't Believe are Online for FREE and The Best Free Horror Books (and some films) that are Online for FREE! and Ghosts & Guns - Over 100 Books You Won't Believe Are Online for FREE and Chomsky, Fascism, Icke, Mises & 100 Other Books You Won't Believe Are Online for FREE and Malachi Martin & the Church & Over 100 Other Books You Won't Believe Are Online For FREE, Serial Killers, Ted Bundy & 100 Other Books You Won't Believe Are Online for FREE and Ayn Rand, Trump & 100 Other Books You Won't Believe Are Online For FREE

Warren Buffett and the Interpretation of Financial Statements

How to Trade in Stocks - The Livermore Formula

Trading in the Zone - Mark Douglas

Stock Investing for Dummies

Penny Stock Trading for Beginners & Dummies by Giovani Rigters

Alan S. Farley, Master Swing Audiobook

Beating the Street by Peter Lynch

The Four Pillars of Investing: Lessons for Building a Winning Portfolio by William Bernstein 

The Little Book of Common Sense Investing by John C. Bogle

Think And Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill

The Little Book That Beats the Market Joel Greenblatt

Fooled by Randomness by Nassim Nicholas Taleb

A Random Walk Down Wall Street, Including A Life-Cycle Guide To Personal Investing by Burton G. Malkiel

Uncommon Sense for the Thoughtful Investor by Howard Marks

The Richest Man in Babylon

The Alchemy of Finance by George Soros

The Warren Buffet Way Second Edition by Robert G. Hagstrom

The ONE Thing: The Surprisingly Simple Truth Behind Extraordinary Results by Gary Keller

Warren Buffett's Management Secrets

Mary Buffett – Buffettology Audiobook

Stock Investing 101

The Market Wizards - Conversations with America's Top Traders by Jack Schwager

Buffet: The Making of an American Capitalist

Trading for a Living: Psychology, Trading Tactics, Money Management by Dr Elder

Common Sense on Mutual Funds by John Bogle

Atomic Habits by James Clear

The Dao Of Capital by Mark Spitznagel, Ron Paul

Michael Lewis - Liar's Poker: Rising Through the Wreckage on Wall Street

The Austrian Theory of the Trade Cycle

Common Stock and Uncommon Profits by Philip Fisher

The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham

David Bach - The Automatic Millionaire

The Magic of Thinking Big by David Schwart

The Millionaire Next Door

How to Make Money in Stocks

The Bogleheads’ Guide to Investing

Irrational Exuberance by Robert J. Shiller

Reminiscences of a Stock Operator: and The Investment Strategies of Jesse Livermore by Edwin Lefèvre

Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds by Charles Mackay
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMnV9ZfCITc

Security Analysis by Benjamin Graham & David L Dodd

Not a Penny More, Not a Penny Less by Jeffrey Archer

Friday, January 24, 2020

The Apple Macintosh on This Day in History


This Day In History: Apple Computer placed the Macintosh personal computer on sale on this day in 1984. The Apple stock ($APPL) price in the IPO (Initial Public Offering) was $22 back then. Today the share price is $317. The most expensive stock is Berkshire Hathaway ($BRK) at $341,225.00. Amazon ($AMZN) is now trading at over $1800 and Tesla ($TSLA) is the new hot stock. If you can't afford to buy these stocks, you can actually buy a portion of these stocks. So let's say you only want to buy $5 worth of an Apple share, you can do that. Stash, M1 Finance and I believe Interactive Brokers allow you to buy Fractional Shares.

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

The DeLorean Car on This Day in History


This Day In History: The production of the iconic DeLorean sports car began in Northern Ireland on this day in 1981, and anyone who's watched Back to the Future knows what a Delorean is. If you've ever wondered why you never actually seen one on the streets at the time, it is because the car sucked. The car’s small engine only produced 130 horsepower, and the stainless steel paneling that gave it such a great look was heavy. The dye from the floor mats would rub off onto shoes and the famous gull-wing doors had a habit of becoming stuck. When Johnny Carson took one for a test drive around the block it broke down. Raising capital to build the car was troublesome as well. John Delorean was caught with $24 million worth of cocaine he wanted to use to fund his dream car. The legal troubles that ensued made him sell his 500-acre New Jersey estate to Donald Trump. John Delorean (the man who also gave us the Firebird and the GTO) died in 2005 in a one bedroom apartment.

Sunday, January 19, 2020

Auguste Comte on This Day in History


This Day in History: Socialist philosopher Auguste Comte was born on this day in 1798. He was the man who coined the term "altruism" and believed that man's highest ideal was to live for others. One writer back in 1883, stated that "Comte's Altruism advances beyond the limits of Christian doctrine. He teaches that, instead of loving our neighbour as ourselves, we should endeavour not to love ourselves at all." Many today still uphold altruism as the highest moral ideal. I don't. Bill Gates may like giving away his money now, but he helped countless millions much more by selfishly developing his Windows operating system. Altruism simply does not put food on the table. As Adam Smith remarked back in 1776, "It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest."

The Altruism of Auguste Comte by Julius Lloyd 1884
https://thebookshelf2015.blogspot.com/2018/06/auguste-comtes-peculiar-form-of.html

What Ayn Rand Meant by Altruism
https://fredericbastiat1850.blogspot.com/2017/12/what-ayn-rand-meant-by-altruism.html

Saturday, December 28, 2019

The Fascist President, Woodrow Wilson, On This Day in History


This Day In History: President Woodrow Wilson was born on this day in 1856. Interestingly, his second wife Edith Wilson died on this day in 1961.

While often ranked as one of the best presidents in US history, Ivan Eland's book "Recarving Rushmore: Ranking the Presidents on Peace, Prosperity and Liberty" ranked Woodrow Wilson as the worst president:

"It can be argued that Wilson screwed up the entire twentieth century and beyond. U.S. involvement in World War I was instrumental in causing a violent twentieth century for the world. As a result of the two world wars, the Russian and Chinese revolutions, and civil wars and conflicts spawned by the Cold War - most of which can be traced to U.S. entry into World War I - the twentieth century was by far the bloodiest in world history. Approximately 110 million people lost their lives in war in that century.

Even before World War I, however, Wilson had dramatically changed the Democratic Party from a Jeffersonian party of small government and military restraint overseas into a part of big government and profligate armed intervention abroad. The war also allowed Wilson to engineer an unprecedented government takeover of the domestic U.S. economy - a model that was later repeated during other crises, such as the Great Depression and World War II." Buy this book on Amazon

See also Woodrow Wilson: America’s Worst and First Fascist President

A Century Ago Woodrow Wilson Took America Into WWI: Blame Him For
Communism, Fascism And Nazism

Sunday, December 15, 2019

“I Believe in Freedom of Expression, but…”


The period between 1980 and 2003 was characterized by an unprecedented development towards democracy, strong institutions, and acknowledgment of human rights. Thus, dictators and authoritarian leaders around world loosened their iron grip on the press and citizens’ right “to know, to utter and to argue freely according to conscience,” as put forward by English poet John Milton in 1644.

Since 2003, however, freedom of expression has suffered multifarious limitations. According to Freedom House, only 13 percent of the world’s population enjoys a free press. Ignited in 2004, the global decline in press freedom has spread like a wildfire, and the number of countries with a free press has decreased by 10 percentage points. Concurrently, well-established democracies are calling for desperate measures to deal with the predicament of balancing civil liberties and national security. To make things worse, guarding against fake news and an emerging demand for shielding minorities against hate speech are gaining support.

On a global basis, the support for freedom of speech is relatively high. People generally consider it a fundamental right to criticize governments and politicians, but when it comes to minorities, the support for free speech vanishes. For instance, a survey conducted by The Varkey Foundation shows that only 49 percent of “Generation Z” believe that people should have the right to speak offensively to minority groups, while only 46 percent of Europeans think that people should be able to publish statements offensive to minorities.
The idea that hateful speech incites violence does not prove correct when examined carefully.


Thus, when talking about freedom of expression, it seems like the prevailing attitude translates into: “I believe in freedom of speech, but…” Nevertheless, this unenthusiastic backing for free speech is highly perilous and allows for governments to restrain freedom of expression in several cases. The reason, it appears, is that a majority of people believe that hateful speech incites violence and conflict. Therefore, governments, companies, and organizations must censor offensive speech. Yet, there is no reason to believe that censorship will improve anything.

On the contrary, the idea that hateful speech incites violence does not prove correct when examined carefully. First of all, is it highly doubtful that hateful speech will encourage others to engage in acts of violence simply because they were exposed to hate speech? Individuals are rational and independent, and the idea that offensive words will drive people to act unlawfully because of offensive words is fallacious. On the other hand, it is likely that hate speech will provoke feelings in people who are already willing to engage in criminal conduct.

Evidence from Rwanda shows that there is not much reason to believe that people are incited to act violently merely because of hate speech. The study finds no significant effect from the state-led Radio Rwanda which propagated hateful messages about the persecuted Tutsis. Another study shows similar results. The author finds that many of the convicted perpetrators of the genocide did not listen to Radio Rwanda.
If, however, we accept that various precautions and curtailments are necessary to preserve diversity and a flourishing democracy, what would the consequences be?
By silencing radical and dissenting viewpoints, European states have fostered an environment of discontent among the silenced.


Restricting freedom of speech in order to protect minorities has already been attempted in several countries. The effects from Europe have, in large, been arbitrary convictions and persecution of offensive statements aimed at people criticizing Islam. Moreover, by silencing radical and dissenting viewpoints, European states have fostered an environment of discontent among the silenced. By legally prosecuting “wrong” viewpoints, extremists will consider themselves as minorities persecuted by an elite. This is backed by a study on right-wing terrorism in which the author concludes that public repression might have fueled extreme right violence.


On a smaller scale, various online platforms have already implemented censorship in order to protect minorities from offensive speech. The results yielded by such efforts seems, however, to be small, if not counterproductive. For instance, Reddit launched a ban on two subreddits particularly known for their offensive language and hateful content. When Reddit decided to ban r/fatpeoplehate and r/CoonTown in 2015, Reddit indeed achieved their objective. But what about the overall effect of the ban? A 2017 study shows that while Reddit did reduce controversial content, people simply fled to other sites to publish hateful content. This resonates with results from a UNESCO study indicating that banning “trolls” will just make them show up elsewhere.
Our observations undertaken here suggest that silencing hateful speech—regardless of the measures—is often unsuccessful or even counterproductive. On this background, we should remember why freedom of expression is so important and why we should cherish this freedom.
For, as numerous scholars have shown, freedom of expression correlates with better protection of human rights, higher GDP, less violence and lower corruption. Finally, repression of freedom of speech has—in a historical perspective—been the most desired instrument for governments and dictators around the world to retain impoverished people in obedience.
Filip Steffensen
Filip Steffensen
Filip Steffensen studies political science at Aarhus University, Denmark. He is affiliated with various domestic organizations promoting classical liberalism and is a representation of Liberal Alliance Youth. He is 21 years old. 
This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.

Monday, November 25, 2019

New Releases and Libertarian Classics Now Available for Kindle and iBook



FEE has a long history of publishing both new and classic texts on the humane values and ethical principles of the free society.

Alongside teaching how markets work, FEE’s focus has always been on teaching why markets matter. That is, how commercial exchange, unimpeded by capricious government intervention, permits people to interact in ways they might not choose were it not for the need to trade. FEE has consistently promoted the ideal of the free society and shown how arbitrary coercion, from any source, is fundamentally incompatible with it.

FEE revived Frédéric Bastiat’s classic The Law with Dean Russell’s translation of Bastiat’s seminal work. Today it remains a sort of “gateway drug” into the classical liberal tradition.
FEE has printed hundreds of thousands of copies of The Law, and continues to distribute it in book form to seminar students and anyone seeking a better understanding of the nature of law and the inevitabilities of human-held power.

Increasingly, our distribution is going digital. FEE.org hosts full texts of Essential Readings from Bastiat, Henry Hazlitt, FA Hayek, and Leonard Read.

Not only are these life-changing texts available through web browsers, but they are now available in formats suitable for all electronic readers.

These eBooks are accessible to people young and old who prefer the convenience and speed of delivery of their Kindle or iPad. Importantly for those readers, text in these books scales to the size of the reader’s screen and can be adjusted to fit his or her preference.

Now available for Kindle, iPad, and iPhone are some of FEE’s most popular texts, as well as some brand new releases:
These texts have been redesigned and optimized for the most popular e-reading platforms, complete with beautiful new cover art.

While we continue to distribute these texts physically, we strive to expand our distribution electronically so that they can be read by people across the globe — by anyone curious about the freedom philosophy and how it applies to a life well lived.

Coming in the next few months are new editions of FEE founder Leonard E. Read’s many books, beginning with his masterpiece Anything That’s Peaceful — available now with a new introduction by FEE president Lawrence W. Reed.

Reed writes, “There it was in one evening’s reading — freedom explained in its essence, socialism debunked at its core, a vision for a better world offered in a compelling — indeed, even inspiring — way."

Keep your eyes peeled for more of Leonard Read's books, alongside a series of beautiful compilations entitled Essays On Liberty, including contributions by Read, Hazlitt, Frank Chodorov, F.A. Harper, and Ludwig von Mises.
Richard N. Lorenc
Richard N. Lorenc
Richard N. Lorenc is FEE's Executive Vice President and serves as managing director of FEE's Youth Education and Audience Research ("YEAR") project to develop and promote new content and distribution techniques for free-market ideas.
This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.